In The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation, George Klosko presents the first book-length treatment of political obligation grounded in the premises of liberal political theory. In this now-classic work, he clearly and systematically formulates what others thought impossible-a principle of fairness that specifies a set of conditions which grounds existing political ob...(展开全部)

In The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation, George Klosko presents the first book-length treatment of political obligation grounded in the premises of liberal political theory. In this now-classic work, he clearly and systematically formulates what others thought impossible-a principle of fairness that specifies a set of conditions which grounds existing political ob...(展开全部)

In The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation, George Klosko presents the first book-length treatment of political obligation grounded in the premises of liberal political theory. In this now-classic work, he clearly and systematically formulates what others thought impossible-a principle of fairness that specifies a set of conditions which grounds existing political ob...(展开全部)

In The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation, George Klosko presents the first book-length treatment of political obligation grounded in the premises of liberal political theory. In this now-classic work, he clearly and systematically formulates what others thought impossible-a principle of fairness that specifies a set of conditions which grounds existing political ob...(展开全部)

The Oxford Handbook of Political Obligation offers an authoritative, up-to-date overview of research in this field. In recent decades, scholars have developed strong criticisms of the traditional reasons given to explain political obligations. At present, skepticism about the possibility of a convincing account may well be the dominant position in the literature. These philosop...(展开全部)

The Oxford Handbook of Political Obligation offers an authoritative, up-to-date overview of research in this field. In recent decades, scholars have developed strong criticisms of the traditional reasons given to explain political obligations. At present, skepticism about the possibility of a convincing account may well be the dominant position in the literature. These philosop...(展开全部)

作者简介：霍华德•沃伦德（Howard Warrender,1922-1985），英国著名政治学家和霍布斯研究学者，1943年以第一名的成绩毕业于牛津大学PPE专业，之后相继任教于格拉斯哥大学、英国女王大学和谢菲尔德大学，其研究和编辑出版的霍布斯著作，在霍布斯学界以及政治理论界产生了巨大的影响。 译者简介：唐学亮，哲学博士，西安交通大学法学院副教授、博士生导师，主要从事法理学、公法理论与政治哲学研究，系国际霍布斯学会会员、欧洲霍布斯学会会员。

作者简介：霍华德•沃伦德（Howard Warrender,1922-1985），英国著名政治学家和霍布斯研究学者，1943年以第一名的成绩毕业于牛津大学PPE专业，之后相继任教于格拉斯哥大学、英国女王大学和谢菲尔德大学，其研究和编辑出版的霍布斯著作，在霍布斯学界以及政治理论界产生了巨大的影响。 译者简介：唐学亮，哲学博士，西安交通大学法学院副教授、博士生导师，主要从事法理学、公法理论与政治哲学研究，系国际霍布斯学会会员、欧洲霍布斯学会会员。